Enhanced exclusive enteral nutrition delivery during the first 7 days is associated with decreased 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with normal lactate level: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Exclusive enteral nutrition (EN) is often observed during the first week of ICU admission because of the extra costs and safety considerations for early parenteral nutrition. This study aimed to assess the association between nutrition intake and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients receiving exclusive EN. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a cluster-randomized clinical trial that assesses the effect of implementing a feeding protocol on mortality in critically ill patients. Patients who stayed in the ICUs for at least 7 days and received exclusive EN were included in this analysis. Multivariable Cox hazard regression models and restricted cubic spline models were used to assess the relationship between the different doses of EN delivery and 28-day mortality. Subgroups with varying lactate levels at enrollment were additionally analyzed to address the potential confounding effect brought in by the presence of shock-related hypoperfusion. RESULTS: Overall, 1322 patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) daily energy and protein delivery during the first week of enrollment were 14.6 (10.3-19.6) kcal/kg and 0.6 (0.4-0.8) g/kg, respectively. An increase of 5 kcal/kg energy delivery was associated with a significant reduction (approximately 14%) in 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.865, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.768-0.974, P = 0.016). For protein intake, a 0.2 g/kg increase was associated with a similar mortality reduction with an adjusted HR of 0.868 (95% CI 0.770-0.979). However, the benefits associated with enhanced nutrition delivery could be observed in patients with lactate concentration ≤ 2 mmol/L (adjusted HR = 0.804 (95% CI 0.674-0.960) for energy delivery and adjusted HR = 0.804 (95% CI 0.672-0.962) for protein delivery, respectively), but not in those > 2 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: During the first week of critical illness, enhanced nutrition delivery is associated with reduced mortality in critically ill patients receiving exclusive EN, only for those with lactate concentration ≤ 2 mmol/L. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN12233792, registered on November 24, 2017.

Body composition after implementation of an enhanced parenteral nutrition protocol in the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomised pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Very low birthweight (VLBW) infants are at risk for growth failure and poor neurodevelopment. Optimised parenteral nutrition may help promote optimal growth and development, but concerns that provision of enhanced nutrition may contribute to increased early adiposity and later metabolic disease remain. AIM: To determine associations between provision of an early enhanced parenteral nutrition protocol or standard parenteral nutrition protocol and growth and body composition for VLBW preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. SUBJECTS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial aimed at assessing the feasibility and safety of randomising VLBW preterm infants to Standard (n = 45) or Intervention (n = 42) parenteral nutrition groups between August 2017 and June 2019. METHODS: We evaluated associations between weekly infant growth and body composition measurements from n = 55 infants (Standard = 29, Intervention = 26) that were clinically stable enough to have body composition measurements taken before discharge using mixed effects linear regression models. RESULT: No statistically significant associations between nutrition group and infant growth or body composition measures were observed (p >.05). CONCLUSION: In this pilot trial, enhanced parenteral nutrition in the first week of life was not associated with significant differences in infant growth or body composition during hospitalisation.

[Commitment of Asunción. A call to action]. / Compromiso de Asunción. Un llamado a la acción.

Introduction: The Latin American Federation of Nutritional Therapy, Clinical Nutrition, and Metabolism - FELANPE, was founded in 1988. It brings together interdisciplinary societies and associations in Clinical Nutrition and Nutritional Therapy from Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as Spain and Portugal. Currently, it comprises representations from 18 countries. The objectives of the Federation are described, taking into account the assumed commitment. This is an observational cross-sectional, multicenter study that included 132 hospitals with more than 100 beds, of high complexity, both state-owned and private, from 14 countries in Latin America that are members of FELANPE. The study assessed hospital characteristics, implementation of nutritional assessment, nutritional diagnosis of patients, the team responsible for nutritional therapy, nutritional therapy (oral, enteral, and parenteral), monitoring, and nutritional follow-up. For this purpose, a digital questionnaire and an explanatory video were designed and validated to ensure the quality of the collected data. Validation was carried out through a pilot study conducted in Paraguay, approved by the Ethics Committee for Research at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the National University of Asunción. The current research has the approval of the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Chemical Sciences of the National University of Asunción and the Ethics Committee of FELANPE. The results presented at the XVIII Latin American Congress of FELANPE in Asunción, Paraguay, on October 12, 2023, serve as a basis for characterizing the implementation of Parenteral and Enteral Nutritional Therapy (medical nutritional therapy) in hospitals in Latin America and are used as technical support for the present Asunción Commitment.

Introducción: La Federación Latinoamericana de Terapia Nutricional, Nutrición Clínica y Metabolismo ­ FELANPE, fue fundada en el año 1988. Reúne a Sociedades y Asociaciones Interdisciplinarias de Nutrición Clínica y Terapia Nutricional de América Latina y el Caribe, además de España y Portugal. Actualmente la conforman representaciones de 18 países. Se describen los objetivos de la Federación teniendo en cuenta el compromiso asumido. Se trata de estudio observacional transversal, multicéntrico en que se incluyeron 132 hospitales con más de 100 camas, de alta complejidad, estatales y privados de 14 países de Latinoamérica miembros de FELANPE. Se evaluaron las características del hospital, la implementación de la valoración nutricional, el diagnóstico nutricional de pacientes, el equipo responsable de la terapia nutricional, la terapéutica nutricional (oral, enteral y parenteral), la monitorización y el seguimiento nutricional. Para tal, se diseñó y validó un cuestionario digital y un video explicativo para garantizar la calidad de los datos recolectados. La validación se efectúo mediante un estudio piloto realizado en Paraguay, aprobado por el Comité de Ética en la Investigación de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción. La investigación actual cuenta con la aprobación del Comité de Ética de Investigación de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción y del Comité de Ética de FELANPE. Los resultados presentados en el XVIII Congreso Latinoamericano de FELANPE, en Asunción del Paraguay, el 12 de octubre del 2023, sirven como base para caracterizar la implementación de la Terapia Nutricional Parenteral y Enteral (terapia nutricional médica) en Hospitales de Latinoamérica y son utilizados como sustento técnico del presente Compromiso de Asunción.

Enteral nutrition consensus report from KEPAN: Indications, choice, practical application, and follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Clinicians are in need of guidance that will ease the application of medical nutrition therapy. In order to facilitate the application and success of medical nutrition therapy, the Turkish Clinical Enteral & Parenteral Nutrition Society (KEPAN) planned a report that is short, is clear, and has clear-cut recommendations that will guide health care professionals in the indications, choice, practical application, follow-up, and stopping of enteral nutrition. METHODS: The enteral nutrition consensus report on enteral nutrition use in medical nutrition therapy was developed by a study group (12 working group academicians and 17 expert group academicians) under the organization of KEPAN. The enteral nutrition consensus report was generated in 5 online and face-to-face phases from December 2019 through October 2022. At the end (Delphi rounds), a total of 24 questions and subjects, recommendations, and comments were sent to the enteral nutrition working group and the expert group via e-mail. They were asked to score the criteria by using the Likert scale. RESULTS: The first round of the study resulted in acceptance of all 24 recommendations. None of the criteria was rejected. Only some minor editing for wording was recommended by the panelists during the first and second rounds of the Delphi study. The final report was sent to all 29 panelists and was approved without any revision suggestions. CONCLUSION: This report provides 24 clear-cut recommendations in a question-answer format. We believe that this report could have a significant effect on the optimum use of enteral nutrition in the context of medical nutrition therapy when clinicians manage everyday patients.

[Comparative study of production and control processes of parenteral nutritional admixtures in neonatology]. / Étude comparative des processus de production et de contrôle analytique des préparations magistrales de mélanges nutritifs parentéraux en néonatalogie.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of disparities in production and analytical control processes on the quality of parenteral nutrition (PN) preparations produced in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region. METHODS: This study was carried out in four hospital pharmacies of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region. To assess the impact of production processes, each centre produced ten PN preparations from the same prescription. Analytical controls (sodium, potassium and calcium dosage) were carried out on all the preparations. To assess the impact of the control processes, a batch of ten preparations was produced from the same prescription. Samples were sent to the four hospital pharmacies for analytical control (sodium, potassium and calcium dosage). RESULTS: Measurements of relative production bias show that there is a significant difference between the preparations from the four centres in terms of sodium and potassium content. Each centre had at least one production bias for one of the three electrolytes measured. Concerning analytical controls, there was a significant difference between the four centres in the sodium and potassium levels measured. With the exception of calcium, all the centres reported measurements within the usual specifications of±10% of the target value. The results obtained have no clinically significant impact. CONCLUSION: The diversity of NP practices has a real impact on the quality of the preparations made. A regional collaboration should be envisaged to standardise patient care.

A medium-chain fatty acid analogue prevents hepatosteatosis and decreases inflammatory lipid metabolites in a murine model of parenteral nutrition-induced hepatosteatosis.

BACKGROUND: Parenteral (intravenous) nutrition is lifesaving for patients with intestinal failure, but long-term use of parenteral nutrition often leads to liver disease. SEFA-6179 is a synthetic medium-chain fatty acid analogue designed to target multiple fatty acid receptors regulating metabolic and inflammatory pathways. We hypothesized that SEFA-6179 would prevent hepatosteatosis and lipotoxicity in a murine model of parenteral nutrition-induced hepatosteatosis. METHODS: Two in vivo experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, six-week-old male mice were provided an ad lib fat-free high carbohydrate diet (HCD) for 19 days with orogastric gavage of either fish oil, medium-chain triglycerides, or SEFA-6179 at a low (0.3mmol/kg) or high dose (0.6mmol/kg). In the second experiment, six-week-old mice were provided an ad lib fat-free high carbohydrate diet for 19 days with every other day tail vein injection of saline, soybean oil lipid emulsion, or fish oil lipid emulsion. Mice then received every other day orogastric gavage of medium-chain triglyceride vehicle or SEFA-6179 (0.6mmol/kg). Hepatosteatosis was assessed by a blinded pathologist using an established rodent steatosis score. Hepatic lipid metabolites were assessed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Effects of SEFA-6179 on fatty acid oxidation, lipogenesis, and fatty acid uptake in human liver cells were assessed in vitro. RESULTS: In the first experiment, mice receiving the HCD with either saline or medium-chain triglyceride treatment developed macrovesicular steatosis, while mice receiving fish oil or SEFA-6179 retained normal liver histology. In the second experiment, mice receiving a high carbohydrate diet with intravenous saline or soybean oil lipid emulsion, along with medium chain triglyceride vehicle treatment, developed macrovescular steatosis. Treatment with SEFA-6179 prevented steatosis. In each experiment, SEFA-6179 treatment decreased arachidonic acid metabolites as well as key molecules (diacylglycerol, ceramides) involved in lipotoxicity. SEFA-6179 increased both ß- and complete fatty oxidation in human liver cells, while having no impact on lipogenesis or fatty acid uptake. CONCLUSIONS: SEFA-6179 treatment prevented hepatosteatosis and decreased toxic lipid metabolites in a murine model of parenteral nutrition-induced hepatosteatosis. An increase in both ß- and complete hepatic fatty acid oxidation may underlie the reduction in steatosis.

Parenteral support and micronutrient deficiencies in children with short bowel syndrome: A comprehensive retrospective study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is the leading cause of chronic intestinal failure. The duration of parenteral support (PS) and the long-term micronutrient needs in children with SBS vary, based on their clinical and anatomical characteristics. Our study aimed to review the clinical course and identify high risk patient groups for prolonged PS and long-term micronutrient supplementation. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on electronic medical records of children with SBS and chronic intestinal failure who were enrolled in the multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation program at Manchester Children's Hospital, UK. Children were included in the review if they required PN for more than 60 days out of 74 consecutive days and had at least 3 years of follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0. RESULTS: 40 children with SBS achieved enteral autonomy (EA) and 14 remained dependent on PS after 36 months of follow up. Necrotizing enterocolitis was the most common cause for intestinal resection (38.9%) followed by gastroschisis (22.2%), malrotation with volvulus (20.4%), segmental volvulus (9.3%) and long segment Hirschsprung disease (1.9%). Those who achieved EA had significantly longer intestinal length 27.5% (15.0-39.3) than those who remained on PS 6.0% (1.5-12.5) (p < 0.001). Type I SBS was only found in the PS cohort. Median PN dependence was 10.82 months [IQR 5.73-20.78]. Congenital diagnosis was associated with longer PN dependence (21.0 ± 20.0) than acquired (8.7 ± 7.8 months), (p = 0.02). The need for micronutrient supplementation was assessed after the transition to EA; 87.5% children had at least one micronutrient depletion, most commonly Vitamin D (64.1%), followed by iron (48.7%), Vitamin B12 (34.2%), and vitamin E (28.6%). Iron deficiency and vitamin A depletion were correlated with longer PS after multivariate analysis (OR: 1.103, 1.006-1.210, p = 0.037 and OR: 1.048, 0.998-1.102, p = 0.062 respectively). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, small bowel length was the main predictor for EA. Children on longer PS, had more often a congenital cause of resection and were at risk for micronutrient deficiencies in EA.

Changes of gut microbiota under different nutritional methods in elderly patients with severe COVID-19 and their relationship with prognosis.

Background: The clinical progression of individuals afflicted with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection exhibits significant heterogeneity, particularly affecting the elderly population to a greater extent. Consequently, the association between nutrition and microbiota has garnered considerable interest. Hence, the objective of this study was to gather clinical data pertaining to the influence of diverse nutritional support interventions on the prognosis of geriatric patients with COVID-19, while additionally examining the fecal microbiota of these individuals to assess the repercussions of microecological alterations on their prognostic outcomes. Results: A total of 71 elderly patients diagnosed with severe COVID-19 were included in this study. These patients were subsequently divided into two groups, namely the enteral nutrition (EN) group and the parenteral nutrition (PN) group, based on the type of nutritional support therapy they received after admission. The occurrence of complications was observed in 10.4% of patients in the EN group, whereas it was significantly higher at 69.6% in the PN group (P<0.001). Furthermore, the 60-day mortality rate was 2.1% (1/48) in the EN group, while it was notably higher at 30.4% (7/23) in the PN group (P=0.001). To identify the independent predictors of 60-day mortality, stepwise logistic regression analysis was employed. Among different bacterial groups, Enterococcus_faecium (18.19%) and Pseudomonas_aeruginosa (1.91%) had higher average relative abundance in the PN group (P<0.05). However, the relative abundance of Ruminococcus was higher in the EN group. Further Spearman correlation analysis showed that Enterococcus_faecium was positively correlated with poor clinical prognosis, while Ruminococcus was negatively correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Conclusions: This study shows that the changes in the composition of intestinal flora in elderly COVID-19 patients receiving different nutritional support strategies may be related to different clinical outcomes. The abundance of Enterococcus_faecium in elderly COVID-19 patients receiving PN is significantly increased and is closely related to poor clinical outcomes. It highlights the potential of microbiome-centric interventions to mitigate and manage COVID-19 in older adults with different nutritional support options.

Crosstalk within peripheral blood mononuclear cells mediates anti-inflammatory effects of n-3 PUFA-rich lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Parenteral nutrition (PN) rich in n-6 and n-3 long-chain fatty acids is used in clinical practice for nourishing patients who are unable to receive adequate nutrition through their digestive systems. In this study, we compare the effect on inflammation of the commonly used lipid emulsions Omegaven (n-3-rich) and Intralipid (n-6-rich) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). METHODS: PBMCs were treated with different doses of n-3-rich Omegaven and n-6-rich Intralipid and the immune cells were characterized by flow cytometry. RESULTS: We show that incubation of PBMCs with n-3-rich Omegaven leads to an increase in expression of CD1d and CD86 in CD14+monocytes. At the same time, an increased number of NKT cells expressing cytotoxic T cell antigen 4 is observed, suggesting immunological synapse formation. Both CD14+monocytes and NKT cells showed an increase in IL-10 production and a reduction in the pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-4, which led to an increase in the number of FOXP3+T regulatory cells. In addition, we show that n-3-rich Omegaven reduces the expression of TNFα, IFNγ and IL-4 in CD4+T and CD8+T cells independent of the presented interaction between CD14+monocytes and NKT cells. The described mechanism of n-3 rich lipid emulsions was confirmed in PBMCs from patients with inflammatory bowel disease but not in colorectal cancer patients which seem to lack the interaction between CD14+monocytes and NKT cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results show a mechanism for the beneficial effect of the n-3-rich Omegaven in patients with inflammatory conditions but questions its use in patients with cancer. Hence, our results may assist in choosing the best lipid emulsion for patients who require PN.

Finding the sweet spot: Managing parenteral nutrition-related glycemic complications in hospitalized adults.

Parenteral nutrition (PN) remains an important aspect of treating hospitalized adult patients who are otherwise unable to achieve adequate nutrition intake. PN is highly individualized and requires careful adjustment of macronutrients and micronutrients to minimize complications. One frequent complication associated with PN involves blood glucose (BG) derangements including both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. PN-related glycemic complications are complex and multifactorial. Close BG monitoring is required for selecting and evaluating therapeutic interventions. BG goals for patients treated with PN may vary depending on patient-specific characteristics. Since dextrose provides the carbohydrate source in PN prescriptions, hyperglycemia may be expected, but nondextrose causes must also be considered. Insulin is a mainstay of therapy for managing glycemic complications related to PN, and the regimen chosen depends on patient-specific factors. However, insulin therapy also places the patient at an increased risk of hypoglycemia. Similarly, insulin is not the sole cause of hypoglycemia in these patients. The aim of this review is to describe the factors associated with dysglycemia during PN therapy and provide recommendations for minimizing and managing these complications, which is paramount to providing high-quality patient care and improving clinical outcomes.

Safety in parenteral nutrition compounding.

Parenteral nutrition (PN) compounding is a complex process that requires knowledge and training to ensure the safety and efficacy of this form of nutrition support therapy. Unfortunately, errors and lack of adherence to safe PN compounding recommendations and sterile compounding requirements have resulted in patient injury and death. These lapses in the safe provision of PN have been the result of various factors, including a lack of understanding of PN compatibility, stability, and sterility requirements, as well as drug product shortages and order entry errors. This review will describe the current challenges with the education and training regarding PN compounding, compatibility and stability of PN admixtures, simultaneous administration of nonnutrient medications with PN admixtures, and specific challenges with special populations such as neonates, pediatrics, and those receiving home care.

Composite lipid emulsion use and essential fatty acid deficiency in pediatric patients with intestinal failure with high parenteral nutrition dependence: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Reports of essential fatty acid deficiency (EFAD) in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) and a composite lipid (mixed oil intravenous lipid emulsion [MO ILE]) are predominantly when managed by lipid restriction. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of EFAD in patients with intestinal failure (IF) who are PN dependent without lipid restriction. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients, ages 0-17 years, followed by our intestinal rehabilitation program between November 2020 and June 2021 with PN dependency index (PNDI) of >80% on a MO ILE. Demographic data, PN composition, PN days, growth, and plasma fatty acid profile were collected. A plasma triene-tetraene (T:T) ratio >0.2 indicated EFAD. Summary statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum test evaluated to compare between PNDI category and ILE administration (grams/kilograms/day). P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (median age, 4.1 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 2.4-9.6]) were included. The median duration of PN was 1367 days (IQR = 824-3195). Sixteen patients had a PNDI of 80%-120% (61.5%). Fat intake for the group was 1.7 g/kg/day (IQR = 1.3-2.0). The median T:T ratio was 0.1 (IQR = 0.1-0.2) with no values >0.2. Linoleic and arachidonic acid were low in 85% and 19% of patients, respectively; however, Mead acid was normal in all patients. CONCLUSION: This report is the largest to date on the EFA status of patients with IF on PN. These results suggest that, in the absence of lipid restriction, EFAD is not a concern when using MO ILEs in children receiving PN for IF.

In parenteral nutrition-fed piglets, fatty acids vary by lipid emulsion and tissue sampled.

BACKGROUND: Children with intestinal failure without liver disease may be given soy-based lipid emulsion (SLE) or mixed lipid emulsion (MLE; containing soy, medium-chain triglyceride, olive, and/or fish oils). Both differ in essential fatty acid content: MLE has added arachidonic acid (AA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The aim of this study, in neonatal piglets, was to compare serum and tissue fatty acid composition when the emulsions were given at unrestricted doses. METHODS: We compared SLE (n = 15) and MLE (n = 15) at doses of 10-15 g/kg/day in parenteral nutrition (PN). On day 14 we collected serum and tissues. Using gas-liquid chromatography, percentage fatty acids were measured in serum, brain, and liver phospholipid. Comparisons were made to reference values from litter-matched controls (n = 8). RESULTS: Comparing median values, linoleic acid (LA) was lower for MLE vs SLE in serum (-27%), liver (-45%), and brain (-33%) (P < 0.001). AA was lower for MLE in serum (-25%), liver (-40%), and brain (-10%). DHA was higher for MLE in serum (+50%), liver (+200%), and brain (+10%). AA levels were lower for MLE vs control piglets in serum (-81%), liver (-63%), and brain (-9%). DHA levels were higher in serum (+41%), liver (+38%), and brain (+19%). CONCLUSION: This study in piglets has shown that, at unrestricted doses, MLE treatment is associated with low serum and tissue AA compared with SLE and healthy litter-matched controls. Although not yet proven, low tissue AA levels may have functional consequences, and these data support current practice avoiding MLE dose restriction.

Examining the Nutrition, Oral Mucositis, and Gastrointestinal System Symptoms of Intensive Care Units Patients Receiving Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition.

BACKGROUND: This descriptive study aims to examine the complications that might develop in patients who receive enteral or parenteral nutrition treatment in intensive care unit in this process and to examine the nutritional status, oral mucositis, and gastrointestinal system symptoms among patients who receive enteral or parenteral nutrition treatment in intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of this study consists of 104 patients who received enteral or parenteral nutrition treatment in intensive care units between January and June 2019. The data were collected face to face by using Sociodemographic Form, constipation severity scale, Mini Nutritional Assessment Scale, Mucositis Assessment Scale, visual analog scale, and gastrointestinal system Symptoms Scale. The results were calculated as numbers, percentage, SD, and mean values. RESULTS: Among the participating patients, 67.4% were older than 65 years, 55.8% were female, 42.3% were receiving treatment in internal medicine intensive care units, and 43.4% had severe mucositis. It was determined that 31.7% of the patients receiving treatment in intensive care units required nutrition treatment. It was determined that patients receiving parenteral nutrition had more symptoms such as gastrointestinal system symptoms, mucositis, constipation, and colonic inertia. CONCLUSIONS: It was determined that when compared to the patients receiving enteral nutrition, the patients receiving parenteral nutrition had higher scores in mucositis, visual analog scale pain, Mini Nutritional Assessment Test, constipation, obstructive defecation, colonic inertia, and gastrointestinal symptom total scores.

An Umbrella Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions, Excluding Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition, Initiated in the Hospital for Adults with or at Risk of Malnutrition.

BACKGROUND: Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) on various nutritional interventions in hospitalized patients with or at risk of malnutrition are available, but disagreements among findings raise questions about their validity in guiding practice. OBJECTIVES: We conducted an umbrella review (a systematic review of systematic reviews in which all appropriate studies included in SRMAs are combined) to assess the quality of reviews, identify the types of interventions available (excluding enteral and parenteral nutrition), and re-analyze the effectiveness of interventions. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. AMSTAR-2 was used for quality assessment and GRADE for certainty of evidence. Updated meta-analyses with risk of bias (ROB) by Cochrane ROB 2.0 were performed. Pooled effects were reported as relative risk (RR), with zero-events and publication bias adjustments, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) performed for mortality, readmissions, complications, length of stay, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 66 randomized controlled trials were cited by the 19 SRMAs included in this umbrella review, and their data extracted and analyzed. Most clinical outcomes were discordant with variable effect sizes in both directions. In trials with low ROB, interventions targeting nutritional intake reduce mortality at 30 d (15 studies, n: 4156, RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.94, P: 0.02, I2: 6%, Certainty: High), 6 mo (27 studies, n: 6387, RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.92, P = 0.001, I2: 4%, Certainty: Moderate), and 12 mo (27 studies, n: 6387, RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.95, P: 0.01, I2: 33%, Certainty: Moderate), with TSA verifying an adequate sample size and robustness of the meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence is sufficient to show that nutritional intervention is effective for mortality outcomes at 30 d, 6 mo, and 12 mo. Future clinical trials should focus on the effect of nutritional interventions on other clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022341031).

Injectable Lipid Emulsion and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Exclusively Receiving Parenteral Nutrition in an ICU: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Japanese Medical Claims Database.

Guidelines for the nutritional management of critically ill patients recommend the use of injectable lipid emulsion (ILE) as part of parenteral nutrition (PN). The ILE's impact on outcomes remains unclear. Associations between prescribed ILE and in-hospital mortality, hospital readmission, and hospital length of stay (LOS) in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) were investigated. Patients who were ≥18 years old in an ICU from January 2010 through June 2020, receiving mechanical ventilation, and fasting for >7 days, were selected from a Japanese medical claims database and divided, based on prescribed ILE during days from 4 to 7 of ICU admission, into 2 groups, no-lipid and with-lipid. Associations between the with-lipid group and in-hospital mortality, hospital readmission, and hospital LOS were evaluated relative to the no-lipid group. Regression analyses and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficients, and hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted for patient characteristics and parenteral energy and amino acid doses. A total of 20,773 patients were evaluated. Adjusted OR and HR (95% confidence interval) for in-hospital mortality were 0.66 (0.62-0.71) and 0.68 (0.64-0.72), respectively, for the with-lipid group relative to the no-lipid group. No significant differences between the two groups were observed for hospital readmission or hospital LOS. The use of ILE for days 4 to 7 in PN prescribed for critically ill patients, who were in an ICU receiving mechanical ventilation and fasting for more than 7 days, was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality.

Efficacy and Safety of Teduglutide in Infants and Children With Short Bowel Syndrome Dependent on Parenteral Support.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of teduglutide treatment in infants and children with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF). METHODS: Two open-label phase 3 studies and 1 extension study investigated the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of teduglutide (0.05 mg/kg/day) in infants and children with SBS-IF: NCT03571516, 24-week study of infants who were randomized to receive teduglutide or standard of care (SoC); NCT02980666, 24-week study of infants and children who all received teduglutide; and NCT03268811, 24-week extension study of patients who completed NCT02980666 (patients could receive up to 48 weeks of total treatment). RESULTS: Twelve infants and 8 children enrolled in the core studies, and 2 infants and 7 children in the extension study. After 24 weeks of treatment, parenteral support (PS) requirements reduced by ≥20% from baseline for 4 infants (57.1%) and 4 children (66.7%) receiving teduglutide and for 2 infants receiving SoC (50.0%). One infant (50.0%) and 4 children (80.0%) receiving teduglutide maintained the ≥20% reduction in PS at 48 weeks of treatment. Two children receiving teduglutide achieved enteral autonomy, after 12 weeks and 28 weeks of treatment, respectively. All adverse events (AEs) were in line with known impacts of SBS-IF and adverse reactions to teduglutide. Only one serious AE (abdominal pain) was considered related to teduglutide. CONCLUSIONS: Short- and long-term treatment with teduglutide resulted in clinically meaningful reductions in PS requirements for infants and children with SBS-IF. Teduglutide was well tolerated, and efficacy improved with longer-term treatment.

Peripheral parenteral nutrition: An evaluation of its use, safety and cost implications in a tertiary hospital setting.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Malnutrition is a common challenge among hospitalised patients and its associatiation with poor patient health-related outcomes places a significant financial burden on the healthcare system. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is the primary means for providing nutrition to individuals in whom enteral feeding is not possible but is costly and requires invasive central venous access. Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) provides a suitable option for early nutrition provision in select patients; however, its routine use has been limited by safety and tolerability concerns, with high rates of phlebitis reported in previous studies. The objectives of this study were to review the use, safety, and costs of PPN in an Australian tertiary hospital. METHODS: A single-site, prospective observational study was conducted over 15 months in a tertiary hospital. 139 participants (87 male and 52 female) were enrolled in the study. Data collected assessed the indication for PPN initiation, compliance with the hospital's protocols for PPN, total fasting days, the proportion of the patient's total energy and protein requirements provided by PPN, the incidence of phlebitis and potential cost implications associated with the use of PPN. RESULTS: 139 patients (62.6% male), median age 62 years (IQR (interquartile range) 48-74) were enrolled. Most patients had an emergency admission (80.6%) under a general surgical team (84.2%). Forty-eight patients (34.5%) were malnourished, as assessed by the Subjective Global Assessment tool (SGA). Patients fasted for a median of 3 days (IQR 2-5) before PPN commencement, with a median duration of PPN use of 3 days (IQR 2-4). PPN provided an average of 61.6% of the patients' required caloric intake and 46.4% of protein requirements. Progression to TPN was observed in 34.5% of patients. There were low rates of complications with phlebitis observed in 3.7%, extravasation in 1.1%, and no patients developed septicaemia, despite suboptimal compliance with the recommended cannula management guidelines for PPN (66.4% compliant). The cost of PPN was estimated to be AUD$187 per patient day. CONCLUSION: PPN is an effective short-term nutrient delivery solution to facilitate early feeding with small numbers of patients requiring transition to TPN. PPN was safe with low rates of cannula complications. Costs were favourable, with potentially significant cost savings as compared with TPN.

An Overview of Short-Bowel Syndrome in Pediatric Patients: Focus on Clinical Management and Prevention of Complications.

Short-bowel syndrome (SBS) in pediatric age is defined as a malabsorptive state, resulting from congenital malformations, significant small intestine surgical resection or disease-associated loss of absorption. SBS is the leading cause of intestinal failure in children and the underlying cause in 50% of patients on home parental nutrition. It is a life-altering and life-threatening disease due to the inability of the residual intestinal function to maintain nutritional homeostasis of protein, fluid, electrolyte or micronutrient without parenteral or enteral supplementation. The use of parenteral nutrition (PN) has improved medical care in SBS, decreasing mortality and improving the overall prognosis. However, the long-term use of PN is associated with the incidence of many complications, including liver disease and catheter-associated malfunction and bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). This manuscript is a narrative review of the current available evidence on the management of SBS in the pediatric population, focusing on prognostic factors and outcome. The literature review showed that in recent years, the standardization of management has demonstrated to improve the quality of life in these complex patients. Moreover, the development of knowledge in clinical practice has led to a reduction in mortality and morbidity. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team that includes neonatologists, pediatric surgeons, gastroenterologists, pediatricians, nutritionists and nurses. A significant improvement in prognosis can occur through the careful monitoring of nutritional status, avoiding dependence on PN and favoring an early introduction of enteral nutrition, and through the prevention, diagnosis and aggressive treatment of CRSBIs and SIBO. Multicenter initiatives, such as research consortium or data registries, are mandatory in order to personalize the management of these patients, improve their quality of life and reduce the cost of care.